Weaknesses found, then hardened, Evidence you can take to the board

evidence-of-ai-resilience
Evidence of AI resilience you can put in front of the board and regulators
new-ai-systems
New AI systems tested and cleared for launch in days, not quarters
findings-that-close-themselves
Findings that close themselves: testing flows directly into hardening

Attack Your AI, On Purpose

Thousands of simulated attacks spanning the latest AI threat techniques, running continuously against your AI systems. Not a quarterly exercise. A standing adversary on your side.

Models, applications, agentic workflows, and MCP servers. If it reasons, retrieves, or acts, it gets tested the way attackers would test it.

Prompt hardening remediates discovered weaknesses at the system-prompt layer. Testing flows directly into hardening, so findings close instead of piling up.

Prove Your AI Is Safe, Before Attackers Do

Sooner or later the board will ask: how do we know our AI cannot be turned against us? Hope is not an answer. A pen test from last quarter is not one either, because your AI changed since then, and so did the attacks. AI Red Teaming answers with evidence, continuously attacking your AI systems the way adversaries would, then hardening what it finds. Your answer becomes a report, not a hope. Evidence you can put in front of the board and regulators.

prove-your-ai-is-safe

How it works

A Standing Adversary, On Your Side

thousands-of-automated-attack-simulations
Thousands of automated attack

simulations spanning the latest AI threat techniques, run continuously

coverage-for-models
Coverage for models

applications, agentic workflows, and MCP servers

prompt-hardening
Prompt hardening

that remediates discovered weaknesses at the system-prompt layer

findings-mapped
Findings mapped

to recognized AI risk frameworks for audit and compliance reporting

findings-mapped
New AI systems

tested and cleared for launch in days, not quarters

attack-techniques
Attack techniques

refreshed from ThreatLabz research, so tests track what adversaries actually do

results-feed-ai-guard-for-apps
Results feed AI Guard for Apps

so what testing finds, runtime protection holds

Use cases

Prove it’s safe, Before attackers do

Every AI system you ship is a system someone will try to break. AI Red Teaming breaks it first, safely, and hardens what it finds, so launches move fast and stay defensible.

Clearing a launch

A new AI assistant is ready for production, and the review board wants proof it is safe. Continuous adversarial testing clears it in days, with findings hardened and documented, not debated.

 The board question

When leadership asks how you know your AI cannot be turned against you, the answer is a current report: what was attacked, what held, what was fixed. Evidence, not assurance.

MCP servers in the wild

Agent tooling multiplies faster than any manual review. MCP servers and agentic workflows get the same continuous adversarial testing as your models and apps.

The finding that closed itself

 A jailbreak path is discovered on Tuesday, hardened at the system-prompt layer, and retested by Wednesday. Testing and hardening are one loop, not two backlogs.

Part of Zscaler AI Security

Testing is one loop in the platform. What red teaming finds, the rest enforces.

AI Guard for Apps
AI Guard for Apps

runtime protection holds the line on what testing uncovered, in production.

AI SPM
AI SPM

posture findings show where to point the next round of testing.

AI Gateway
AI Gateway

hardened MCP servers and agent workflows sit behind per-action authorization.

AI Access Graph
AI Access Graph

blast radius context shows what a discovered weakness could actually reach.

dhawal-zscaler-video

Zscaler Security For AI Overview